Abstract: Governments in many middle income countries promote the interests of a small set of firms while erecting barriers to entry and threatening the property rights of other economic actors. We show how such economic favoritism yields second-best outcomes that are nevertheless welfare-superior to scenarios with no property rights, but fall short of the first-best outcome of free entry and open competition. We develop a model to explain how such policies are politically feasible and can be optimal from the perspective of rulers when first-best policies are not. We illustrate the political economy of middle income countries with the examples of Suharto’s Indonesia, Mexico under Porfirio D´ıaz, and Thailand in the second half of the 20th century.
- About
- Fellows
- Issues
- Library & Archives
- Hoover+
- Events
- Subscriptions
- Research Programs
- Support
-
MyHoover
-
MyHoover
What is MyHoover?
MyHoover delivers a personalized experience at Hoover.org. In a few easy steps, create an account and receive the most recent analysis from Hoover fellows tailored to your specific policy interests.
Watch this video for an overview of MyHoover.
Create AccountForgot Password
Login?
-
MyHoover
-
MyHoover
What is MyHoover?
MyHoover delivers a personalized experience at Hoover.org. In a few easy steps, create an account and receive the most recent analysis from Hoover fellows tailored to your specific policy interests.
Watch this video for an overview of MyHoover.
Create AccountHave questions? Contact us
Forgot Password
Login?
-
Support Hoover
Support Hoover
Learn more about joining the community of supporters and scholars working together to advance Hoover’s mission and values.
Learn More